Beschreibung The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action (Rhetoric & Public Affairs) (English Edition). Despite the tepid reception of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke in 1978, the Supreme Court has thrice affirmed its holding: universities can use race as an admissions factor to achieve the goal of a diverse student body. This book examines the process of rhetorical invention followed by Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr., his colleagues, and other interlocutors as they sifted through arguments surrounding affirmative action policies to settle on diversity as affirmative action’s best constitutional justification. Here M. Kelly Carr explores the goals, constraints, and argumentative tools of the various parties as they utilized the linguistic resources available to them, including arguments about race, merit, and the role of the public university in civic life. Using public address texts, legal briefs, memoranda, and draft opinions, Carr looks at how public arguments informed the amicus briefs, chambers memos, and legal principles before concluding that Powell’s pragmatic decision making fused the principle of individualism with an appreciation of multiculturalism to accommodate his colleagues’ differing opinions. She argues that Bakke is thus a legal and rhetorical milestone that helped to shift the justificatory grounds of race-conscious policy away from a recognition of historical discrimination and its call for reparative equality, and toward an appreciation of racial diversity.
The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court ~ Book Description: Despite the tepid reception ofRegents of the University of California v.Bakkein 1978, the Supreme Court has thrice affirmed its holding: universities can use race as an admissions factor to achieve the goal of a diverse student body.This book examines the process of rhetorical invention followed by Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr., his colleagues, and other interlocutors as they .
The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court ~ (2019). The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court Opinions, Public Argument, and Affirmative Action. Quarterly Journal of Speech: Vol. 105, No. 1, pp. 123-127.
The Rhetorical Invention Of Diversity Supreme Court ~ Download Free: The Rhetorical Invention Of Diversity Supreme Court Opinions Public Arguments And Affirmative Action Rhetoric Public Free Reading Down load The Rhetorical Invention Of Diversity Supreme Court Opinions Public Arguments And Affirmative Action Rhetoric Public free of charge PDF ebooks; Published by leading university professors; Easy and Adverts No cost eBooks and textbooks .
THE RHETORICAL INVENTION OF DIVERSITY: SUPREME COURT ~ THE RHETORICAL INVENTION OF DIVERSITY: SUPREME COURT OPINIONS, PUBLIC ARGUMENTS, AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION Vol. 28 No. 7 (December 2018) pp. 91-93 THE RHETORICAL INVENTION OF DIVERSITY: SUPREME COURT OPINIONS, PUBLIC ARGUMENTS, AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, by M. Kelly Carr. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 2018. 310pp. Paper $49.95 ISBN: 1611862841. Reviewed by Stephan Stohler .
The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court ~ Bakke in 1978, the Supreme Court has thrice affirmed its holding: universities can use race as an admissions factor to achieve the goal of a diverse student body. This book examines the process of rhetorical invention followed by Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr., his colleagues, and other interlocutors as they sifted through arguments surrounding affirmative action policies to settle on diversity .
The rhetorical invention of diversity : Supreme Court ~ Get this from a library! The rhetorical invention of diversity : Supreme Court opinions, public argument, and affirmative action. [M Kelly Carr] -- "Despite the tepid reception of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke in 1978, the Supreme Court has thrice affirmed its holding: universities can use race as an admissions factor to .
The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity : Supreme Court ~ Get this from a library! The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity : Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action. [M Kelly Carr; Project Muse.] -- "Despite the tepid reception of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke in 1978, the Supreme Court has thrice affirmed its holding: universities can use race as an admissions factor to .
The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court ~ The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court Opinions, Public Argument, and Affirmative Action M. Kelly Carr Michigan State University Press 2018 310 pages $49.95 Rhetoric and Public Affairs Series KF8748 This study offers a rhetorical analysis of the Supreme CourtAEs 1978 Regents of the University of California v. Bakke decision, which .
[DOWNLOAD PDF] The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity ~ Apr 19, 2019 - [DOWNLOAD PDF] The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity Supreme Court Opinions Public Arguments and Affirmative Action Rhetoric Public Affairs Free Epub/MOBI/EBooks
The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court ~ The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action (Rhetoric & Public Affairs) [Carr, M. Kelly] on . *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action (Rhetoric & Public Affairs)
The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court ~ The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action (Rhetoric & Public Affairs) - Kindle edition by Carr, M. Kelly. Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments .
The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court ~ Sell, buy or rent The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, 9781611862843 1611862841, we buy used or new for best buyback price with FREE shipping and offer great deals for buyers.
Rhetorical Contingency and Affirmative Action: The Paths ~ Bakke</italic> (1978), the Supreme Court issued a landmark decision addressing the constitutionality of university affirmative action policies. Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. concluded that universities could consider race as a factor to achieve the goal of a diverse student body. This study situates <italic>Bakke</italic> within its broader rhetorical environment of public discourses about race .
The Kohrs-Campbell Prize in Rhetorical Criticism ~ Year Award Winner; 2019: M. Kelly Carr, The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court Opinions, Public Argument, and Affirmative Action 2017: No award given: 2015: Michael J. Lee, Creating Conservatism: Postwar Words that Made an American Movement. 2013: Stephen Hartnett, Executing Democracy: Volume Two, Capital Punishment and the Making of America, 1835-1843.
Rhetorical Contingency and Affirmative Action: The Paths ~ Show simple item record. Rhetorical Contingency and Affirmative Action: The Paths to Diversity in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Quarterly Journal of Speech: Vol 105, No 1 ~ Download multiple PDFs directly from your searches and from tables of contents; Easy remote access to your institution's subscriptions on any device, from any location; Save your searches and schedule alerts to send you new results; Choose new content alerts to be informed about new research of interest to you; Export your search results into a .csv file to support your research
Faculty Profiles / University of West Florida ~ Her forthcoming book manuscript, entitled “The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court Opinion, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action,” examines archival materials of a landmark 1978 affirmative action case to explore the internal negotiations and public influences behind the final decision.
Vantage Points: CASSH Blog / University of West Florida ~ But my theory of the Supreme Court rhetorical invention process - how justices go about writing their decisions - is not meant to be limited to this case. And I extend my analysis to the more recent Supreme Court cases about affirmative action in my conclusion, both in 2003 and more recently with Fisher v. University of Texas in 2013 and 2016. In those cases, Powell's reasoning was largely .
Ph.D. Alum Authors New Book / UMD Department of Communication ~ In 2018, Ph.D. alum M. Kelly Carr (Ph.D., 2010) authored The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court Opinions, Public Arguments, and Affirmative Action, published by Michigan State University Press. In the book, Carr examines the process of rhetorical invention followed by Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr., his colleagues, and other interlocutors as they sifted through arguments surrounding .
Argumentation and Advocacy - Books and Journals ~ The rhetorical invention of diversity: Supreme Court opinions, public argument, and affirmative action. The attraction of the ideal has no traction on the real: On adversariality and roles in argument. How to belong: Women's agency in a transnational world. Speech and Debate as Civic Education. The playful divide: a new look at arguing for fun.
Rostow, Kennedy, and the Rhetoric of Foreign Aid. By ~ The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court Opinions, Public Argument, and Affirmative Acti. November 2018 · Argumentation and Advocacy Phillip E. Wagner
Academic Ethics: Is ‘Diversity’ the Best Reason for ~ When affirmative action came under attack in the 1970s and 1980s, as Dobbin shows, “human-resources experts pointedly argued that diversity training and work-family programs were not affirmative .
Tom 5 Nr 3 (2018): Retoryka ruchów społecznych/ Rhetoric ~ Recenzja/Review: M. Kelly Carr, The Rhetorical Invention of Diversity: Supreme Court Opinions, Public Argument, and Affirmative Action, East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 2018
Argumentation and Advocacy, Vol. 55, No. 1-2, Summer-Fall ~ The rhetorical invention of diversity: Supreme Court opinions, public argument, and affirmative action, edited by M. Kelly Carr Lansing, Ml, Michigan State University Press, 2018, pp., $49.95 (Paperback), ISBN: 978-1-61186-284-3 Though decades have passed.